Delta and hedging
In "The one-step binomial model" the number of shares in the replicating portfolio appeared as the solution of two equations. This lesson shows that is also a sensitivity: how much the option value changes when the stock price moves. That reading turns replication into a practical tool, hedging, and leads to a second sensitivity, gamma, which measures how well a hedge holds up. It builds on "Multi-step trees and backward induction".
Delta in a tree
Take one node of a binomial tree. From the current stock price the stock moves to or , and the call is then worth or . The replicating portfolio holds shares, with
This is a ratio of changes: change in option value divided by change in stock price. In the worked example of the one-step lesson (, , , ) the call pays 20 or 0 and the stock ends at 120 or 90, so . Each unit of stock movement moves the option by about two thirds of a unit.
Delta as a derivative
Let the time step shrink, as in the multi-step trees. The two prices and move closer to , and the difference quotient above becomes a derivative. Write for the option value as a function of the current stock price and time. Then
Geometrically, is the slope of the curve at today's price. For a call this curve is increasing and convex: deep out of the money it is flat (the option is nearly worthless whatever the stock does), deep in the money it runs parallel to the line . So the delta of a call always lies between 0 and 1:
A put has delta between and , because its value falls when the stock rises.
The hedged portfolio
Suppose you own one call and want to remove your exposure to small stock moves. Sell shares short. The combined position is
Over a short interval the stock changes by . To first order, the call changes by and the short stock position changes by , so
A position with zero first-order sensitivity to the stock is called delta-neutral. This is the replicating portfolio of the tree lessons read the other way round: instead of building the option from stock and bond, you cancel the option's stock exposure with stock.
Delta is the number of shares that replicates the option locally. Holding removes exposure to small stock moves.
Gamma and the hedge error
The cancellation above is only first-order. A Taylor expansion of in , ignoring the passage of time over the short interval, gives
Gamma is the curvature of the value curve: how fast delta itself changes when moves. Substituting into the hedged portfolio, the linear terms cancel and what remains is
For a long call , so the hedged position gains a little on any large move, up or down. The error grows with the square of the move: double the move and the error is four times larger. Gamma is largest for options near the money and close to maturity, where the value curve bends most sharply.
The figure plots the call value against (with , ) together with the tangent line at the current price ; the tangent's slope is . The dashed line is the payoff at maturity. The vertical gap between curve and tangent is exactly the hedge error; the readouts show it for a move of 10 up and 10 down. Move and watch run from near 0 to near 1; shorten or lower and note that the curve hugs the payoff more tightly, the bend at sharpens and near the strike rises.
- Call value
- 8.26
- Δ
- 0.591
- Γ
- 0.0220
- Hedge error for a −10 / +10 move
- 1.16 / 1.00
A worked example
Take , , , , . The call is worth about 10.45, with and . A dealer who sold 100 calls hedges by buying about 63.7 shares.
If the stock jumps to 110, the tangent predicts a call value of , while the true value is about 17.66. The gap is about 0.84 per call. For a drop to 90 the gap is about 1.01. The gamma estimate gives , between the two. For a move of only 1 the error is about 0.009, a hundred times smaller, as the square law predicts.
Rebalancing
Delta changes whenever or changes, so a hedge set up today is only correct today. Keeping the position delta-neutral means rebalancing: recomputing and adjusting the share holding at regular intervals. In the tree this happens at every node, which is exactly what backward induction prescribes.
In practice rebalancing is discrete, say once a day. Between rebalances the stock moves by a finite amount and the hedge error accumulates. Rebalancing more often makes each error smaller (it is proportional to the square of the stock move), but trading costs grow with the number of trades. Think of steering a car: small, frequent corrections keep you in the lane, but each one costs a little effort. Perfect replication, as assumed in option pricing, corresponds to continuous rebalancing with no trading costs.
A simulated hedge
The figure follows a short call over three months (, , ) along one simulated path. The hedged book holds shares and rebalances every 1, 5 or 21 trading days; the unhedged book only holds the premium. Press Play to watch both evolve day by day. The unhedged result swings with the stock, while the hedged one stays close to zero. The readouts give the spread of the final result over 200 paths: it grows roughly with the square root of the rebalancing interval, as the error suggests.
- This path: hedged P&L
- 0.27
- Hedging error sd (every 5 d, 200 paths)
- 0.93
- Unhedged P&L sd
- 6.49
Summary
- In a tree, is both the replicating share holding and the sensitivity of the option to the stock.
- In the continuous limit , the slope of the value curve; for a call .
- The portfolio is delta-neutral; its remaining change is , with gamma the curvature.
- Hedges must be rebalanced; discrete rebalancing leaves an error of about per interval, which shrinks as the intervals get shorter.
The next lessons replace the tree with a continuous model of the stock. In that model delta of a call has a closed form, .